Monday, May 3, 2010

RSS against Sikhism


Another attack to abolish Sikh culture by ZEE TV…..
Bertrand Russel (Nobel Prize in Literature, 1950)

He said "If some lucky men survive the onslaught of the third world war of atomic and hydrogen bombs, the SIKH religion will be the ONLY means of guiding them.


Why Hindu Drink animal Blood ?

Some hardcore Hindus practice a method of decapitating and drinking goat blood directly from its body. This practice is widely prevalent throughout Indian villages(cities,too are no exception).

These photographs are from a Hindu temple in Malaysia.
It is believed by Hindus that the hindu goddess "Kali" descends upon that girl and she drinks the blood. Its a more common practice to make blood sacrifice to hindu gods,but this is way out of bounds.


Recently the Brahmkumari Ishwariya Vishwa Vidyalaya at Mount Abu published this picture in their magazine 'PARMATMA DI PACHAN' it its just to show Sikh gurus as being enlightened from their Lord Shiva whereas this status of Shiv is disowned and rejected by Sikh Gurus. i feel pity.

This only shows a malicious attempt to merge Sikh religion into manifolds of Hinduism as they have swallowed Jain and Baudh religion in India. But Sikhism is a distinct, sovereign and complete religion in itself. Since birth to his last rites of a Sikh-the Sikh religion is fully capable to take care of the Sikh and to give a permanent rest of departed soul in heavenly abode. We need not to get help of any other religion in any of our ritual.

The real motive of RSS exposed-THE SAFFRON TERROR.


>Views of Baba Saheb Bhim Rao Ambedkar on Hindu Religion;


["We have read and learn about Sikh Guru and there revolutionary act to bring society out of darkness , Let have a look at the hindu law during that time which is nowadays taking a shape again."]

On December 25th 1927, Dr.Ambedkar burnt Manusmriti

He (Bhramin) must never read the Vedas in the presence of the Shudras. (Manu IV. 99.)
Any Brahmin, who enslaves or tries to enslave a Brahmin, is liable for a penalty of no less than 600 PANAS. A Brahmin can order a Shudra to serve him without any remuneration because the Shudra is created by Brahma to serve the Brahmins. Even if a Brahmin frees a Shudra from slavery the Shudra continues to be a slave as he is created for slavery. Nobody has the right to free him. (Manu VIII-50,56 and 59)
Every woman must be loyal, faithful. obedient honorable to her husband even if he is blind, deaf, dumb, old, physically handicapped, debauchel or, gambler and neglects his wife and lives with his concubine(s). If the husband is unhappy, it would be the fault of his wife. If he cries, she should cry. If he laughs she should laugh. She can only answer humbly to his question. She should not on her own put any question. She should eat only after her husband eats. If he is beating she should not react, but fall on his feet and beg him to pardon her, and kiss his hands and pacify him. If the husband dies she should burn herself to death on his funeral pyre and go along with him to the other world and serve him there in this manner. (Padma Purana)
Killing of a woman, a Shudra or an atheist is not sinful. Woman is an embodiment of the worst desires, hatred, deceit, jealousy and bad character. Women should never be given freedom. (Manu IX. 17 and V. 47, 147)
A woman shall not perform the daily sacrifices prescribed by the Vedas. Then according to IX.37 if she does it, she will go to hell. (Manu XI. 36)
Her father protects (her) in childhood, her husband protects (her) in youth, and her sons protect (her) in old age; a woman is never fit for independence."
" No Shudra should have property of his own, He should have nothing of his own. The existence of a wealthy Shudra is bad for the Brahmins. A Brahman may take possession of the goods of a Shudra. (ManuVIII-417 & X129)
"Brahmins to give Shudras food leftovers, old torn clothes, spoiled grain and old utensils (Manu X-125)"
Read full article here :


Game plan of RSS before partition ?
In 1973, I met a taxi driver at Saharanpur while I was on the way to Sri Amritsar Sahib, Punjab. I don’t remember his full name but surname I do remember was Sharma and he was a Punjabi young man in his late thirty. I befriended with him. We stopped on the way for some refreshment and then a topic on RSS started. How it started, I exactly don’t remember but i think it started on Muslims. He told me that he was a Hindu but he was circumcised. I was amazed and asked him the reason. Then he revealed his story that he belonged to RSS in Pakistan before partition and narrated the achievements of RSS and their saga how they saved Hindus and Sikhs in Western Pakistan.

During those days, there were not any differences among Mone Punjabis and Sikh Punjabis. There life style, food habits were almost same. Hindu – Mone Punjabis had faith in Sikh gurus and they never tried to establish any link in between Hindu deities and Sikh Gurus. There common enemy was Muslim league which later on turned against Muslims.

What he told me is an unforgettable saga of RSS in Western region of undivided Punjab.In his words; that Sharma ji was a teen age boy. His face was clean and no sign of hormonal changes had occurred. He said that they used to go the mosques and in the meetings of Muslims and keep informing the proceedings and planning of Muslims to the local wing of RSS. The RSS than alert the non Muslims of the area. Muslims were amazed as their plan were leaked and they could not make any strategy. Every information was provided by this (and his friends of same age group) to local cadres of RSS.
Then Muslims started searching every one before his entry to Mosque. Now there was a problem as these youngsters were Hindus and were not circumcised, and their was danger on their appearance in Mosque. There was a great risk of life so RSS choose another plan. They now sent these boys wearing a veil so that they may attend and sit in ladies. Sometime it went on but again the suspicion arose as their planning were leaked. Then they banned ladies to enter in Mosque but allowed them at a distance to perform Namaz or do religious duties.
It was a critical time for RSS as the differences in Muslims and Non Muslims were on extreme.

Thus RSS adopted a deadly plan. Soon a Maulwi was searched to teach these Hindu boys the Namaz and preach them verses from Qoran and Hadiths, taught them Urdu language, circumcised & prepared them fake Muslims who could go easily in Mosque, who could attend their secret meetings and they could not be identified.

They were perfect in carrying out Muslim religious duties. It took them nearly 3-6 months to get trained.
After their training was complete, the RSS cadre killed that Maulwi in fear of any reveal of their plan where as he was assured of 3000 Rs, which was a big sum in that period.

My above revelation is also approves from following news clip;





-->


True fanatic face of RSS


After Partition, Now against Sikhs;
Sikhism which came up during this thousand-year interregnum, as a distinct religion, has since been the butt of Hinduism.

-->
Sikhism which came up during this thousand-year interregnum, as a distinct religion, has since been the butt of Hinduism.
It was good enough to protect the non Muslims at that time but the strategy is being applied to divide Sikhs and to submerge Sikhism into folds of Hinduism. They have already submerge the Jains, Bodhis earlier but Sikhs are cautious and they will certainly save them selves from there clutches.
The RSS has trained 5000 Hindus as Sikhs. They are given training of Sikhism, fully trained to Sikh traditions, language and culture. They are given the knowledge of Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji so that when they talk some one, they may leave a good impression of their knowledge and love to Sikhism but they will translate the Sloks wrongly and to prove the Sikhs as Hindus.
So Sikhs should identify these Vibhshans like they are working in Sikhi sarups in Rashtriya Sikh Sangat which is a wing of RSS to spread their message in ignorant Sikhs. Those Sikhs who do not recite Gurbani but just born in a Sikh family, becomes easy targets and they find these wolves as true Sikhs.


Harmandar Sahib (Golden Temple) - A Sikh shrine (Amritsar).


-->
Every Sikh family should start learning the concept of Guru Gobind Singh ji, creation of Khalsa and they should never forget that all Gurus are one jot, one soul, incarnation of, and enlightened by one Guru – Guru Nanak Dev ji only. Guru Gobind Singh ji bestowed the Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji as eternal Guru forever to Sikhs.
Sikhs have there holy book Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji, which is bestowed by Guru Gobind Singh ji as spiritual Guru of Sikhs so they (Sikhs) don’t have any need to get any message from Hindu religious books. These Hindu religious books are not written by any of their founder of religion as it has no founder but a faith in 330 million deities. You will be surprised that the population of undivided India was almost same in 1947. All were deities and goddesses.
The story as to how the Sikhs, who were the third party at the time of Indian independence, have been reduced to a non-existent role, and how using the Hindu card, the leadership of the Indian National Congress (which has been in power during the last 43 out of 47 years) has gradually pushed the Sikhs out of the national mainstream which enabled Indira Gandhi to launch her Sikh war, makes a grim reading.



Screen shot copy of RSS website where RSS declares the famous Sikh shrine-HARMANDAR SAHIB JI (GOLDEN TEMPLE) Amritsar - India, as a Hindu temple.



-->
See the intention of the narrator who is short sighted and a traitor (who again wants to divide India) says that the Garlic and Onions are used in community kitchen (Langar Hall). The foolish person is so ignorant that he does not know that Meat is allowed to eat in Sikh religion. It is entirely upon one's own wish to eat or not. Garlic and Onions are served in every family may be vegetarian. If these things are not eaten by Hindus even in SHRAADHAS so what. It is their decision. We Sikhs have no faith in Shradhas and do not follow these Brahminical rituals.

He stayed two days at Harmandar Sahib, had food, had karaah parsaad, got a stay there and even then betrayed like another famous Hindu trait, GANGU BRAHMIN (Cook of Guru Gobind Singh ji who betrayed with mother of Guru ji and reported to Nawab of Sirhind and helped in arrest of the minor sons of Guru ji and his mother in lieu of reward only). He btrayed by calling this sanctum sactorium as Shivalaya, he forgot that in Shivalya the idols of sexual organs of Shiv and Parvati are worshiped.

Hindus of Amritsar have tried to copy this beautiful heaven on earth as
DURGYANA MANDIR.

The narrator on this website is an active member of RSS, He even does not know that the founder of Sikh religion Guru Nanak Dev ji declared that
Neither he is Hindu nor Muslim. This was followed by all Gurus. Guru Gobind Singh ji created Khalsa a pure religion, to which Hindus and Muslims both embraced. We have the eye-witness report of that day. A Muslim spy of Aurangzeb- Abibullah Turrani, sent a last report of that day to Aurangzeb and warned him of his misdeeds with the Peer of Peers. After sending this report, he too embraced Sikhism. Guru ji gave him Nectar and a new name as Ajmer Singh. I have full report.

You are probably wondering what
"Bipran Ki Reet" is and what is has to do with Sikhism. Well, the answer is very simple. Bipran Ki Reet is a phrase which refers to the Principles of Brahmins or of the Hinduism. The phrase itself is derived from two words: "Bipar" meaning Brahmin and "Reet" meaning principle. Combined these two terms make Bipran Ki Reet which is used as a reference to a distancing from Sikh principles and some sort of following of mindless rituals.

So in other words following Bipran Ki Reet is going away from Sikhi. Most people know the most common practices of Hindus such as idol worship but there are many other that we overlook. Every Sikh should know what it is and you can only become true Sikh if you follow teachings of Gurus but not Hindus. Guru Gobind Singh Ji said:

"Jab Lag Khalsa Rahe Niara, Tab Lag Tej Dioon Mein Sara

Jab Eh Gaye Bipran Ki Reet, Main Na Karoon In Ki Parteet"

http://www.searchsikhism.com/bipran.html
So the RSS members should always keep in mind that SIKHS ARE NOT HINDUS.


-->
The editor of Astha Magzine in his edtion April 2010 (Part-1) has published the story of Vaisakhi day of 1699. In which he writes that Guru mixed SHARAAB in bowl of nectar, witch he served to five beloved, consumed himself and than distributed in congregation.

Is this not part of a conspiracy by rss cadre to malign Sikh religion and founder of Khalsa? Is it not the thanklessness to that Guru who saved Hindu religion and it's honor? if Hindus are enjoying liberty, pride, honor, freedom of religion, their own independent and sovereign nation, is all due to Guru Gobind Singh ji.

THEY [HINDUS] HAVE FORGOTTEN AND BACK-STABBED IN OUR SIKH RELIGION LIKE THIS AND BY KILLINGS THE INNOCENTS, RAPING OUR WOMEN, MOLESTATION, ARSON IN 1984.

First of all I'd whole heartedly thank those Hindus who acted humanly and came out to help their Sikh bretheran during 1984 Genocide of the Sikhs. But the majority of the Hindus were and still are racist. Its not just the Congress but the RSS and other Hindu extremist bodies too that are hell bent upon to extinguish the Sikhs and other communities from present day India (Hindustan). Today Hindus think the present day India belongs to them only and they are the bloody sole owner of the land whereas if you verify the historical evidences, all your misconceptions will be cleared. The Sikhs are the one and only community who sacrificed their lives more than Hindus and all others. Independence was not won by FUDU Gandhi, who was bloody busy sleeping with naked young women during nights and playing dramas of so called ahimsa-vad only to woe the peasants. It were the Punjabis in general and specifically the Sikhs who worked side by side on the frontiers along with the Indian Fauz to fight the agressors during wars. Sikhs were always loyal to their motherland and never betrayed. On the other hand, dig out all the fauzi and non-fauzi cases of betrayal with he country and you will find the Hindus doing all these stupid things, you have the latest case involving a Hindu female officer deputed in one of Indian consulate in Pakistan and caught in espionage case. You people now think that India belongs to you people only; where were you guys when Hindustan was in the clutches of the British?

The truth is that you, the Hindus, are illegally occupying the PUNJAB.

Today people like you say that "Rajiv Gandhi is not Hindu, Sonia Gandhi is not Hindu, Indira Gandhi was not Hindu." but it were the same Hindus who regarded this clan as their only savior and bastards like Amitabh Bachchan shouted slogans against the Sikhs to extend their support to this Moghul family. Amitabh, the SOB, is also a Hindu. Sajjan, Tytler, Lalit Maakan, Dharamdas Shastri, HKL Bhagat, Kamalnath, etc. are all Hindus and their role in 1984 Sikh Genocide is a world known fact.

Hindus are the most communal people in the whole world.

The atrocities committed on the Sikhs in Punjab during 80s and 90s were by the Hindus only using Hindustani military, para-military and police forces well supported by the third agencies of the world's most corrupt and racist so called largest democracy. The hHndustani third agencies are aggressively active against the Sikhs in Indian Occupied Punjab, rest of India and other parts of the world with sole aim to eliminate the Sikhs and work to defame the Sikhs.

However, I personally pay my respects to exceptional people like Mr. Jaiswal and many others who acted like a role model to help the fellow Sikhs. (Added by
S. Sukhjinder singh ji from facebook).

RSS cadre and other Prominent Hindu leaders, please see below the sacrifices given by Sikhs and others to liberate
India for British empire; just compare with yourself who back stab now to Sikhs.

Where were you? Ran away like Savarkar who compromised with British to get released from Cellular jail (Andaman-Nikobar), known as KALA-PANI.

Punishment Suffered

Sikhs……Non-Sikhs…Total

Hanged
93…………..28…………121
Imprisoned for life (KALA PANI)
2147………499………..2646
Killed at Jalianwala Bagh
799………..501………..1300
Killed at Budge Budge Ghat
67…………..46…………113
Killed in Kooka Movement
91…………. ---…………..91
Killed in Akali Movement
500………….---………...500
Grand Total
3697……...1074………..4771

-->
This screen shot proves the mal-intention of RSS, and its game plan to submerge Sikhism in main folds of Hinduism.

To begin with, Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi, the acclaimed father of the nation, did not accept Sikhism as a religion distinct from Hinduism; and the Sikhs trustingly - a trust that immediately after independence was betrayed - placed all their eggs in the Congress basket without suspecting the Hindus. They are now paying the price for that trust. As of now, thinking Sikhs all over the world are apprehensive of the very existence of Sikhism in India as a vibrant faith. With their back to the wall, the Sikhs face Hobson's choice.
In retrospect, Hinduism's extermination of Buddhism did not lead to wholesome results. The cost-benefit ratio was in an adverse scale. But the Hindus have learnt one thing from history that they cannot learn anything. This is not the first time that the Sikhs face extinction in India. Attempts have been made earlier as well.




-->
Sikhism stands today at the same crossroads where Buddhism once stood at the beginning of the 9th century. Just as the Buddhists and their places of worship came under attack from a reviving Brahminism under the inspiration of Adi Shankaracharya, so too have the Sikhs come under the assault from not very dissimilar forces.

The role of RSS in 1984 Sikh genocide.....



Recently, a crucial document has surfaced which may throw some light on the unhidden aspects of the genocide. It was authored and circulated by a luminary and veteran of the RSS, Nana Deshmukh on November 8, 1984.Interestingly, this document was published in the Hindi Weekly Pratipaksh edited by George Fernandes (Defence Minister of India 1999-2004, and presently a great pal of the RSS) in its edition of November 25, 1984 titled ‘Indira Congress-RSS collusion’ with the following editorial comment:
“The author of the following document is known as an ideologue and policy formulator of the RSS. After the killing of Prime Minister (Indira Gandhi) he distributed this document among prominent politicians. It has a historical significance that is why we have decided to publish it, violating policy of our Weekly. This document highlights the new affinities developing between the Indira Congress and the RSS. We produce here the Hindi translation of the document.”
MOMENTS OF SOUL SEARCHING;
-->
Indira Gandhi ultimately did secure a permanent place at the doorstep of history as a great martyr. With her dynamism borne out of her fearlessness and dexterity, she was able to take the country forward like a colossus for over a decade and was able to build an opinion that she alone understood the realities of the country, that she alone had the ability to run the decadent political system of our corrupt and divided society, and probably that she alone could keep the country united. She was a great lady and her death as a brave leader had added to her greatness. She was killed by a person in whom she kept faith despite several complaints. Such an influential and busy personality was killed by a person who had the duty to protect her person. This act came as a blow not only to her admirers in the country and the world but also her critics. This cowardly and treacherous act of killing not only ended the life of a great leader but also killed, in the name of the Panth, the mutual faith of humanity. Explosion of sudden arson and violent hysteria throughout the country was probably a direction-less and improper expression of the hurt, anger and feeling of loss of her followers. Lakhs of her followers used to see her as the only defender, powerful protector, and a symbol of united India. It is a different matter whether this is right or wrong
For these innocent and uninformed followers, the treacherous murder of Indira Gandhi was the tragic culmination of the poisonous campaign of separatism, antagonism and violence conducted over the previous three years in which hundreds of innocents had to lose their invaluable lives and the sanctity of religious places was destroyed. This campaign assumed an ominous pace after the painful army action in June which, in the eyes of most of the people of the country, had become necessary to protect the sanctity of the religious places. Barring a few exceptions, the Sikh community observed silence for a long time on the barbaric massacres and heinous killings of innocent people, but they condemned the long-pending army action with anger and dangerous explosiveness. The country was stunned at their attitude. The army action was compared to the “gallu ghara” action of Ahmed Shah Abdali in 1762 to desecrate the Harmandir Sahib. Without going into the objectives of the two incidents, Mrs. Gandhi was pushed into the category of Ahmed Shah Abdali. She was termed the enemy of the Sikh panth and big prizes were announced on her head. On the other hand Bhindrawale who was guilty of heinous crimes against humanity in the name of religion was hailed as a martyr. Open display of such feelings in different parts of the country and abroad played a special role in increasing the distrust and alienation between the Sikhs and the rest of Indians. In the background of this distrust and alienation, stunned and bewildered people accepted the validity of the rumours of celebrations by the Sikhs at the heinous murder of Indira Gandhi by her Sikh bodyguards in retaliation of the army action. Of these the most hurting explanation was that of Giani Kripal Singh who being the Head Granthi considered himself to be the sole spokesman of the Sikh community. He said that he expressed no sorrow at the death of Indira Gandhi. This statement added fuel to the fire of boiling anger. No immediate and natural condemnation of this despicable statement by an important leader came from responsible Sikh leaders, intellectuals or organization. Therefore the already angered common and unimaginative people took it as correct that the Sikhs celebrated the death of Indira Gandhi. Because of this belief, selfish elements could succeed in making the common people become violent against the helpless Sikhs.
This was a most explosive situation which needed utmost patience and skilful conduct on behalf of our Sikh brothers. I am saying this, being a life member of the RSS, because on January 30, 1948 a Hindu fanatic, who was a Marathi and had no relation with the RSS, rather was a bitter critic of the Sangh, committed unfortunate killing of Mahatma Gandhi. On this occasion we also suffered the sudden eruption of hysteria, loot and atrocities of misdirected people. We ourselves saw how selfish elements who were well acquainted with this incident, deliberately declared a murderer to be a member of the RSS and also spread the rumour that the RSS people were celebrating throughout the country death of Mahatma Gandhi, and thus they succeeded in diverting the love and the feeling of loss and hurt in the hearts of people for Gandhi. Such feelings were spread against Swayamsewaks and their families, particularly in Mahrashtra.
Having gone through such experiences myself, I can understand the strong reaction and feeling of innocent Sikh brothers who became of victims of sudden eruption of people’s violent hysteria. In fact, I would like to condemn in strongest words the inhuman barbarity and cruelty on Sikh brothers in Delhi and elsewhere. I feel proud of all those Hindu neighbours who protected lives and property of troubled Sikh brothers without caring for their lives. Such things one being heard from all over Delhi. These things have practically increased the faith in natural goodness of human behavior and particularly faith in Hindu nature.
I am also worried at the Sikh reaction in such delicate and explosive situation. As an activist engaged in national reconstruction and unity for half a century and being a well wisher of Sikh community I am hesitating in saying that if reactive armed action by Sikhs is even partly true then they have not been able to evaluate the situation correctly and comprehensively and as a result could not respond according to the situation. Here I wish to draw the attention of all my countrymen including Sikhs that in a similar difficult situation arising out of murder of Mahatma Gandhi when in the hysteria against the RSS crimes of destruction of property, heinous burning alive of children, inhuman cruelty etc. were being committed and the news was reaching Nagpur from all over India, then the ‘dictator’ of the RSS known as the so-called big private army, the then head of the Sangh late M.S. Golwalkar issued an appeal in Nagpur on February 1, 1948 to the lakhs of armed young followers throughout the country in the following unforgettable words:
‘I direct all my Swayamsewak brothers that despite spread of provocation due to lack of understanding, they should adopt cordial attitude towards all and remember that this mutual distrust and improper hysteria is the result of the love and respect that the whole country has for Mahatma who made the country great in the eyes of the world. We salute such great respected departed soul’.
These were not empty words to hide cowardice and helplessness in the hopeless situation. In those life threatening serious moments he proved that every word of his appeal had a meaning. On the evening of February 1, hundreds of Swayamsewaks in Nagpur urged for armed resistance and resisting till the last drop of their blood to stop the probable attack on their leader the same night. And some associates of Guruji told him of a conspiracy against his life and requested to shift his residence to a safe place before the attack, Guruji told them in such a black moment also that if the same people whom he had truly and with full ability, served throughout his life wanted to take his life, then why and for whom he should save his life. Thereafter he cautioned them in stern voice that even if a drop of blood of his countrymen was shed in saving him, then such a life would be useless for him. History is a witness that lakhs of Swayamsewaks spread throughout the country followed this directive word by word. Though they had to digest vulgarities in exchange of their patience and tolerance but there was a faith to give them patience that whatever may happen to them in present condition, history will definitely prove them innocent
I hope that in present difficult situation my Sikh brothers will also show the above-referred patience and tolerance. But I am deeply pained to know that rather than displaying such tolerance and patience at some places they have retaliated against the crowd with arms and played into the hands of such selfish elements who were eager to spread the trouble. I am surprised how a section of our society considered to be most disciplined, organized and religious, adopted such a negative and self-defeating attitude. May be they could not get proper leadership at the moments of such a crisis. Through my scanty study and understanding of Sikh history I consider that such a nonpolitical reaction of Sikhs in moments of such a crisis came from their complete involvement with teachings of love, tolerance and sacrifice of Sikh nature. Warrior nature of Sikh religion was a short time provision against barbarity of foreign Mughals which was taught by tenth Guru. For him Khalsa was a relatively small part of a broad Hindu-Sikh brotherhood and was designed as an armed hand to defend Hindu community and its traditions. Guru Govind Singh laid down for Khalsa followers five KS (Kesh, Kripan, Kangha, Kara and Kachha) and ‘Singh’ in the name of Khalsas. This was a symbol of their being soldiers. But unfortunately today these only are being projected as basic and necessary forms of Sikh religion.
I am sorry to say that Sikh intellectuals too have failed to understand that conversion of Sikh religion into Khalsaism is a much later event and this was due to deliberate plan of British imperialists to divide and rule in Punjab. Its aim was to cut the Sikhs off from their Hindu environ. Unfortunately, after independence power hungry politicians kept alive for their own interest the unnaturally born problems of separation and equal existence, and carried forward the game of imperialists to divide and rule by their vote bank politics. This improper equating of Sikhs with militant Khalsaism is not only the basic root of separatist tendencies in some parts of Sikh community, but it also raised militancy and faith in the power of weapons to the level of religious worship.
This religious worship gave rise to terrorist movement like Babbar Khalsa in the second decade and recently Indira Gandhi was killed as a result of terrorist wave under the leadership of Bhindrawale and a long ‘hit list’ is yet to be executed.
I used to imagine that Sikh community has freed itself totally from illiteracy, ignorance, frustration and defeatism in which it was in the fifth decade of 19th century after losing its freedom and which was exploited by cunning British imperialists and selfish Sikh elites for their selfish interests. It is clear that in eighth decade Sikhs adorning the places of high responsibility represent highly educated, laborious, vigilant, relatively rich, enlightened and active section of Indian society in every walk of life. In nineteenth century their experiences and vision was limited to the boundaries of the then Punjab but today they are spread not only throughout India but throughout the world, and they are in a situation to directly know the conspiracies of big powers which are being hatched against independent and united India rising strongly in the world. In such an advantageous situation they should know their historical development as an integral part of India.
Such a revaluation of history will give them the opportunity to see many wrong formulations of their own religion and past which has been systematically drilled into their brains by wrong and distorted historical writings by British administrators and intellectuals about nature and development of their religion. Such an attempt will take them to their real roots.
This is the time that our Sikh brothers should search their hearts so that they can get rid of the false description inserted by British imperialists and power greedy opportunist people into their basic religious nature. Removal of such false descriptions is necessary to bridge the gulf of distrust and alienation between two communities of similar destiny, nature and similar traditions. I am afraid that without such a self-introspection and revaluation of history they would not be able to live with peace among themselves and with other countrymen. A disinterested analysis of their own enlightened interests will be enough to make them understand that their fate is indivisibly linked with the destiny of India. Such an understanding will save them from falling prey to the disruptive and destructive interests of foreign powers.
I disbelieve (sic) that my Sikh brothers will accept the cautious words of spiritual expression of a well-wisher.
Lastly, it is not to deny the truth that sudden removal of Indira Gandhi from Indian political scene has created a dangerous void in the Indian common life. But India has always displayed a characteristic inner strength in the moments of such crisis and uncertainty. According to our traditions, responsibility of power has been placed on the inexperienced shoulders of relatively young person in a lively and peaceful manner. It will be hasty to judge the potentialities of his leadership at this time. We should give him some time to show his ability.
On such challenging juncture of the country, in the meanwhile he is entitled to get full cooperation and sympathy from the countrymen, though they may belong to any language, religion, caste or political belief.
In the capacity of a nonpolitical constructive worker I only hope and pray that God bless him with more mature, balanced, inner strength and ability to give an impartial Govt. to the people so that he can take the country to real prosperous unity and glory.
Guru Nanak Divas
November 8, 1984
Nana Deshmukh.

-->Whereas Indira Gandhi had discussed a plan to air attack on border districts of Punjab to kill Sikhs and than to attack on Pakistan. It was leaked to Beant Singh who with the help of Satwant Singh killed Indira Gandhi to save his people from massacre and the nation from a war. Thanks to him.


-->
The RSS has 25 points with which it hopes to attack the Sikh faith and lead to its eventual assimilation. All 25 points are very easily refuted but lack of education and knowledge coupled with the RSS’s organized attack make this a serious danger.
These points are already being incorporated into school text books and taught as real history. This skewed history is already taught in many areas.
Hindus are calves and cow is their mother.
1) Sikhs are an inseparable part of Hindu society,
2) If Hinduism is a tree, Sikhism is a fruit on that tree,
3) Gurbani is like the Ganga, it emerges from the Gangotri of the Vedas,
4) The Khalsa was crated to protect Hinduism and Hindustan,
5) Japji Sahib is a summary of the Gita,
6) The Failure of the 1857 “War of Independence” [in reality an unorganized uprising by Poorbiya soldiers who 8 years earlier helped the British conquer Punjab] was defeated only by the Sikhs,
7) Banda Singh Bahadur was really Veer Banda Bairagi,
8) The Sikh Gurus worshipped the cow,
9) Condemning Sikh scholars Bhai Kahn Singh Nabha and Bhai Veer Singh,
10) Use examples from Trumpp and other anti-Sikh western scholars,
11) The Sikh Gurus used Vedic ceremonies,
12) Guru Gobind Singh worshipped the Goddess Durga,
13) Guru Sahib was from the family or Ram and his devotee,
14) Sikhs are from Lav-Kush
15) Baba Ram Singh was the legitimate Guru of the Sikhs,
16) Create posters which challenge Sikh principles but appear to be pro-Sikh,
17) Insist on using the Bikrami calendar and share Hindu festivals,
18) Call Bhai Hakeekat Singh, Hakeekat Rai and illustrate him as a clean shaven Hindu,
19) Claim [with no historical basis] that Guru Gobind Singh sent his army to liberate Ram Janam Bhumi in Ayodhya from the Mughals,
20) To create the Khalsa, Guru Gobind Singh seeked blessing from the gods and goddesses and used Hindu mantras. The Kakaars were also blessings from the Gods,
21) Equate ek-oan-kaar with “OM”,
22) Call Bhai Mati Das “Guru Mati Das Sharma”,
23) To do parkash of Sree Guru Granth Sahib in Mandirs and put pictures of Hindu Gods in Sikh Gurdwaras,
24) Project Guru Gobind Singh as having taken a different ideology from Guru Nanak and to make him into a Patriotic Hero of India,
25) Make all of Sikh history take a Hindu tint.













The game plan of RSS is to create posters which challenge Sikh principles but appear to be pro-Sikh as shown above.


Gurpreet Singh writes from Vancouver:  It was during my posting as a staff reporter with The Tribune in Ferozepore, Punjab in 2001 when a school book came into my hand that asked the Class VIII students - which Sikh Guru had sent armies to Ayodhya to liberate Ram temple? The answer in this knowledge book was Guru Gobind Singh. The information had left me baffled. It was in reference to the tenth master of the Sikhs who had laid the foundation of the Khalsa, a militant force of the Sikhs to fight against repression. The army was raised from among the oppressed communities who were treated as untouchables by the caste Hindus to fight back against both caste system and the aggression of an Islamist government.
The problem with the question and the answer was that the information had no solid basis. The Sikh scholars and historians rejected it right away saying that it is a distortion of history.
This was the time when Akali Dal, a regional party of the Sikhs in Punjab was in power in the state and running the show with the support of Bhartiya Janata Party (BJP). Incidentally, the two parties are again in power in Punjab. Under this government, the Rashtriya Swayamsewak Sangh (RSS), an ultra Hindu nationalist body had intensified its activities in the state. The BJP is a political arm of the RSS that wants to turn India into a Hindu state. They had started organizing camps in villages in Punjab around that time. I still remember that the Sikh participants in these drills were referred to as Keshdharis (the bearers of long hair) by the RSS men.
The book with a controversial question and a controversial answer was prescribed in schools run by the RSS which has always claimed that Babar, a Muslim Emperor had demolished the temple that once stood on the birthplace of Lord Ram, a revered Hindu god in Ayodhya and instead built a mosque to humiliate Hindus. Both the RSS and the BJP have always wanted to build a Ram temple at the disputed site. They demolished the mosque in 1992 and are now waiting for an opportune time to build a temple.
The information about Guru Gobind Singh having sent his armies to Ayodhya for the liberation of Ram Temple is part of the propaganda was to attract Sikh support in Punjab where they are in majority. Since the Sikh historians challenged the story, the trick had backfired. One of the towering Sikh priests, Prof. Manjit Singh told me categorically that there was no historical evidence to establish this.
But the story did not end there. The RSS has continuously been trying to rope in the support of Sikhs. Thanks to the Akali Dal, a staunch BJP ally their efforts have paid some dividends. The RSS has been able to make inroads in the minority Sikh community that hardly make two percent of the Indian population. The RSS run schools were getting funds from those in power, I gathered first hand from my own independent research during those years. Apart from the support of the Akali Dal-BJP government, the RSS Sikh agenda itself has confused many in the Sikh community for numerous reasons.
The main reason behind some Sikhs getting influenced by the RSS is purely ideological. The RSS has always treated Sikhs as part of the Hindu mainstream unlike Muslims and Christians. Their propaganda material reveals that they consider Hindus and Sikhs as one nation while Islam and Christianity as foreign religions. Their ideologue M.S. Golwalkar in his writings described the Sikhs as defenders of Hinduism.
The RSS has also formed a Sikh wing called Rashtriya Sikh Sangat that has been distorting history and playing on the fears of gullible section of Sikhs who mistrust Muslims due to lack of understanding of the history. Though Guru Nanak, the founder of Sikhism was born in a Hindu family, he rejected both the caste based oppression in Hinduism and excesses of the Islamist rulers. Yet, the RSS through its Sikh wing has been propagating how Nanak had stood against the persecution of Hindus by Babar. They continue to emphasize that Nanak’s main fight was against Islamists who had invaded Hindu nation, even as he had laid the foundation of a distinct religion that was different from Hinduism.
The RSS literature explicitly claims that the Sikh Gurus had stood for the protection of Hindu nation which is not true. They actually resisted against atrocities from both the Islamist rulers and the orthodox Hindu priests on poor and marginalized. Some articles published in SangatSansar, the publication of Rashtriya Sikh Sangat suggest that Sikh faith was born to protect Hindus from Muslim invaders and conveniently overlook the Gurus’ opposition of caste based oppression. Even if there is a mention of Sikhism’s opposition to casteism, it is negligible. One article reads that Guru Gobind Singh performed the duty of a Kshatriya, a warrior caste which is second to the Brahmins who are top in the caste hierarchy. Indeed, Guru Gobind Singh was born in a Kshatriya caste, but after the formation of the Khalsa he gave up his caste identity.
While the villainy of the Islamist rulers who fought with the Gurus is repeatedly highlighted in these articles, the treachery of some Hindus that led to the persecution of Gurus has been underplayed. It is important to know that in their fight for social justice, the Gurus had many Muslims on their side, while some Hindus sided with the Muslim emperors which only displays that this was a fight between an oppressive state and revolutionaries and wasn’t a Sikh versus Muslim conflict as is being projected by the RSS. Their prejudice towards the Muslims is so blatant that they are even critical of Akbar, a secularist Muslim emperor who was not as tyrant as others. In their writings they accuse him of pursuing Islam through soft methods. I recall an argument I had with an RSS leader in Ferozepore over Tipu Sultan, another tolerant Muslim king who had contributed to the freedom movement. He had fought against the British occupation of Southern India. But that leader was not willing to accept it. He continued to malign him as “barbaric”.
With an aim to convince Sikhs for their support for the cause of Ram Temple, these articles and editorials draw verses from the Sikh literature mainly Dasam Granth that refers to Lord Ram. In fact, parts of the text in the book suggest that Sikh Gurus were born in families which have roots in the clans of the descendants of Lord Ram’s sons. Dasam Granth is believed to have been written by Guru Gobind Singh, but many scholars disagree and insist that not the entire text is written by the Guru and contradicts the values of Sikh philosophy. They point out that Guru Gobind Singh had ordered the Sikhs that after him only Guru Granth Sahib, the holy scripture of the Sikhs be followed as a guiding light. They therefore reject any attempt to promote a parallel scripture whose authenticity is also under question. They think that since Guru Gobind Singh’s retinue had many poets some passages in Dasam Granth cannot be attributed to the Guru as it is possible that they might have actually been written by the poets under him.
Clearly by invoking the fight of Babar with Nanak and Guru Gobind Singh’s connection with Lord Ram, the RSS wants the Sikhs to support them in their anti Muslim campaign. Significantly, one of the resolutions passed by Rashtriya Sikh Sangat calls for the construction of “magnificent” Ram temple in Ayodhya.
Giani Puran Singh, the former head of the Akal Takhat, the highest temporal seat of the Sikhs attended a Rashtriya Sikh Sangat camp in 1997. Puran Singh had stirred the controversy by describing Gurus as the descendants of the sons of Lord Ram.
Interestingly, the editorials in Sangat Sansar also talk about the message of universal brotherhood preached by Guru Granth Sahib that includes hymns of the Hindu and Muslim saints, including those denounced as untouchables by the caste Hindus, still they repeatedly demonize Muslims and Christians. In one of the editorials, questions have been raised over celebrating Christmas on a day that coincides with the martyrdoms of the two sons of Guru Gobind Singh. The two were executed by the Islamist rulers and were handed over to them by a Hindu informer. There is no mention of the controversial role played by the Hindu informer in getting the young boys arrested. Another editorial tried to raise alarm over Christian missionaries spreading their base in Punjab and converting Sikhs.
The double speak of the RSS on the issue of religious minorities can also be gauged from a plain fact that it recognizes the anti Sikh massacre of 1984 as genocide, but remains indifferent towards the massacre of Muslims in 2002 and anti Christian violence of 2008.
Thousands of Sikhs were murdered across India in 1984 following the assassination of the then Indian Prime Minister Indira Gandhi by her Sikh bodyguards. She was murdered for sending troops to the Golden Temple Complex, the holiest shrine of the Sikhs in Amritsar in June that year to flush out handful of armed militants who had fortified the place of worship. The army operation had left many people dead and the buildings inside the complex heavily damaged. Indira Gandhi’s Congress party that claims to be secular was complicit in the mass murders of Sikhs.
In 2002, a similar pogrom was engineered against Muslims by the BJP government in Gujarat after a train bringing Hindu pilgrims from the disputed site of Ayodhya was burnt killing more than 50 passengers. The BJP government had blamed the Muslim fundamentalists for burning the train. It is pertinent to mention that there is no mention of the anti Muslim massacre on the website of the Muslim wing of the RSS.
If this is not enough, the Rashtriya Sikh Sangat calls upon the Indian government to return the artifacts allegedly taken away by the Indian army during the military invasion on the Golden Temple complex. It has also been pleading for clemency to Devinderpal Singh Bhullar, a Sikhmilitant on the death row for his involvement in a bomb blast. Besides, it has been asking for amnesty to former Sikh militants settled abroad so that they could come back home without fear. They have been lobbying for waving the blacklist that bars these Sikhs outside India from visiting their home country. I had a chance to attend a public meeting that was organized by the BJP supporters in Vancouver in 2003 where the former Sikh separatist leaders were also in attendance. The picture of Bhullar whose wife is a Canadian was also at display. The meeting was held to announce the scrapping of the blacklist. The BJP led coalition government was in power at that time and had removed the names of many Sikhs in Canada from the so called blacklist maintained by Indian consulates.
So much so, the Rashtriya Sikh Sangat has been advocating against racial profiling of Sikhs when Sikh militancy was at its peak between mid 1980s to mid 1990s. But such passion has never been displayed for Muslims by the RSS. On the contrary, they have  not only been demonizing Muslims, but have been aggressively asking for the execution of men like Afzal Guru and Yakub Memon the two former militants, who were hung at different times to death in spite of campaigning to save their lives by human rights activists.
In one of the articles published by Sangat Sansar, there is a story about a Sikh human rights activist Jaswant Singh Khalra who was abducted by the Punjab police and murdered for investigating the cases of forced disappearances during Punjab militancy. The article tries to draw a parallel between the police repression and the repression of Sikhs under Islamist rule. In contrast, the RSS recently accorded a heroic welcome to a senior police officer from Gujarat who had been responsible for the murders of alleged Muslim militants in staged shootouts.
In 2008, the Hindu extremists had killed over 50 Christians in Orissa following the murder of a Hindu preacher. This was despite the fact that the Maoists had claimed the responsibility of the killing. A Sangat Sansar editorial blames the violence on Christian missionaries and creates fears about their activities in Punjab.
The politics behind the Sikh agenda of RSS can be interpreted in different ways. One interpretation is that it benefits the BJP in Punjab if it remains soft on Sikh issues to ensure long term Akali Dal support. Akali Dal and its followers see BJP as a trusted ally as against Congress which is seen by them as “enemy of the Sikhs”.
The other interpretation could be that it helps in improving the image of BJP abroad, where the Sikhs dominate the political landscape both outside and within the South Asian Diaspora. And if the Sikhs are on their side, it becomes easier for the BJP to challenge the world leaders who continue to criticize the current BJP government under Narendra Modi for growing religious intolerance and attacks on minorities in India. Modi was the Chief Minister of Gujarat when anti Muslim massacre broke out in the state. The human rights activists and survivours continue to allege his complicity in the violence.
For the record, the Sikhs and non Sikhs who are not familiar with the history suffice is to know that the RSS leader M.S. Golwalkar had cast aspersions on the patriotism of Sikhs who were asking for the reorganization of Punjabi speaking state during 1960s. In his book, Bunch of Thoughts, he accused them of playing into the hands of Pakistan by asking for a separate sectarian state under the garb of a linguistic Punjabi speaking province.
Another RSS leader Nanaji Deshmukh had glorified Indira Gandhi and justified the anti Sikh pogrom in his article Moments of Soul Searching and squarely blamed the Sikh leadership for the massacre.
The former BJP minister Arun Shourie had written an article tilted, Lessons from the Punjab that was highly critical of the Akali Dal that was only seeking extra rights for Punjab. In this piece, he justified the army invasion of the Golden Temple complex and blamed the devastation entirely on the Sikh leadership.
It is widely accepted that the BJP supporters had also participated in the anti Sikh massacre and celebrated the invasion of the Golden Temple.
A controversial Sikh leader Prahlad Singh Chandok attended one of the conferences organized by the Rashtriya Sikh Sangat in 1998. Chandok had presented a robe of honour to Jagdish Tytler, a minister in the Congress government. Tytler was involved in the 1984 anti Sikh violence and had to resign after being indicted by a commission of enquiry.
In 1991, ten Sikh pilgrims were murdered by the police in Uttar Pradesh that was under the BJP rule after being branded as terrorists. All these actions contradict a Sangat Sansar article that says that the Sikhs had contributed more to the freedom struggle of India and a passage posted on Rashtriya Sikh Sangat website that blames the Congress government for promoting anti Sikhbias.
It’s laughable to read that the famous Sikh joke about their going crazy at 12 o’clock has been attributed to the Congress rule on the Rashtriya Sikh Sangat website, whereas the Prime Minister Narendra Modi once came under criticism for cracking a similar joke about the formerSikh Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.
The Akali Dal leaders would like everyone to forget this, but the Sikh settlers from Punjab also came under attack in Gujarat when Modi was the Chief Minister of the state and was running for the office of Prime Minister in 2014. The violence was an outcome of the resistance of Sikhsettlers against the attempts to acquire their lands.
One can figure out that the RSS Sikh agenda is based on deception and distorted history, and above all aimed at dividing minorities in India for which not only the Sikhs, but everyone needs to be vigilant. The Sikhs whose daily prayer ends with plea to the god for well being of the entire mankind in particular must be cautious of the bigotry of the RSS and the BJP towards all religious minorities. As the RSS is expected to grow under the current government a grassroots level fight against such force becomes necessary. It must be borne in mind that the BJP government in the past and at present has not given up its agenda to rewrite history being taught in public schools. A distorted history written from an ultra Hindu nationalist lens can impair young minds studying at public educational institutions. And that’s why it becomes important to challenge any attempt to take over public spaces by the RSS with a patronage of the state.
Make no mistakes. The RSS is not a friend of the Sikhs. It only needs one minority group on its side for political reasons. If the Congress according to them has been appeasing the Muslim minority all these years, how do they explain their stance on Sikh issues? If it suits them they would not shy attacking the Sikhs as aggressively as they have been attacking other minorities. Their attitude towards Sikhs when they were in conflict with the Indian state during mid 1980s is well documented. Their growing penetration in the Sikh community both in India and Canada needs to be checked. They claim to be respectful towards the message of universal brotherhood of Guru Granth Sahib, but hate Muslims and the Christians to the core. For them Guru Granth Sahib represents Akhand Bharat, a unified India and Khalsa is the army ofBharat Mata or Mother India. This kind of framing should alarm those who are concerned over the recent attacks on any voice of dissent by the RSS supporters in India. These voices are being frequently muzzled as “anti national.” It has become important for all the minorities, the oppressed communities and the real secularists to come together and join hands against the RSS. Often they disguise themselves as supporters of Hindu Sikh unity, but the question to ask them is why they don’t promote the unity of all communities in India if they really care for a strong Indian union? The basis of their whole philosophy of dividing people is actually much more seditious, but since they are running the current government with remote control nobody is questioning them. The most illustrative example of how the communities, including minorities are being pitted against each other by the RSS is my interview with a Delhi-based Akali Dal leader Avtar Singh Hit, who had participated in the Ram Temple campaign. On being confronted about this, he replied that some Muslim supporters of Congress also participated in the anti Sikh pogrom of 1984. This is exactly the challenge before us that how theocratic forces play on our fears for “others” and how we need to fail them in achieving their ulterior motives through such nefarious designs. How does it matter if some Muslims were part of the mobs used to kill Sikhs? It was not a Hindu-Sikh or for that matter Muslim-Sikh violence, it was a state sponsored carnage where Sikhs were victims and some good non Sikhs tried to help them. As part of his defence, Tytler - who was involved in the massacre claims that he was born in a Sikh family. Does this mean anything? Whether it was 1984 or 2002, the state needs to be blamed for mass murders of the members of the minority communities. At least learn from the Sikh gurus who never violated the rights of the Muslims in their fight against Islamist Empire and rather stood for the rights of the Hindus even as they were opposed to Hindu rituals and religious practices. The bottom line is that to save humanity we need to fight against divisive forces that are inimical to people’s unity.


What is the definition of Hindu;

-->
Do you believe all these as real facts:
1) Krishna married 16008 girls and he was able to keep everyone happy and satisfied, he was a kind of gigglo. He raped many dalit girls and later story was twisted as if he married all 16008 girls.
2) Hanumanji lifted full mountain with his one hand
3) Monkey built the bridge over the sea in south india.
4) Saraswati married to Brahma , her own father
5) Ram and Ramayana is 400 million years old
6) Draupadi married to five brothers ( looks like family incest)
7) Kauravs had 100 sons.
8) Kunti became virgin mother.
9) Ravan had 10 heads, he was devil, because he was not Aryan, though he was more powerful, because a mortal man needed no bridge to come to India, but Ram had to build a bridge with the help of Monkies to go to Sri Lanka.
10) A God has elephant face
11) A God has monkey face
12) Sacrificing animals (murdering) makes god happy.- So Karma theory is bogus claim by Hindus.
13) Variety of war missiles used in Mahabharatha- astra , shastra. But still import all kind of war material from foreign countries.
14) Vishnu has so many avatars, Even Gandhiji, Albert Einstein, George bush , Pope are Vishnu's avatar...LOL.
15) Brahma and his wife used to go out every day to create the world and all the things in it.
16) Agni is the son of his father and his sister [ Rg Ved.I.91.7 ]
Father-daughter incest occurs in the famous story of Prajapati (later
identified with Brahma, in tunr incorporated as an incarnation of Vishnu) and
his daughter [ RV III.31.1-2 ].
17) Pushan is the lover of his sister [Rg Ved VI.55.4 ][ Apte 11 ]
We all believe these ... because it is written in mythology, if you don't believe we are fools.
Actually Hindu is not any religion. This word is originated from Persia, Iran) where it means-THIEF. When Persians came across river Indus, most of them settled here. They brought their culture here and these people were called Aryans. It is said that these Aryans pushed the Drawids (the locals) to south across Vindhyachal.
Can some one tell me about at least one God in Hinduism which ever existed? There are evidences by Govt of India sponsored institutions who say even Ram never existed who was merely a role model character like spiderman. The first prime minister of India also said Ramayan and Mahabharata are mere Arabian night stories.
Now let us have a look on these Hindu religious books, what do they preach to common Hindu in life.
RIGVEDA;

-->
The rain god of India - DEVRAJ INDRA is said to be king of deities in heaven. He is fond of eating meat of Cows and liked to drink alcoholic liquor (Somras) [with ref. INDRA VIJAY KAAVYA] From Rigveda—varikha kaapayi ! Rewti ! saputre ! aadu ! susnukhe ! ghast indra ! okhn: priyam kaachirkram hawi: vishwasmaadindra utar “ (13)
Okhno hi me panchdasm saakm pachnti wishti utaahm admi peev idubha kukhi pint me wishwasmaat indra uttr:
Means : Brikha kaapyi said to Indrani, o the mother of beautiful sons and daughters in law ! your husband deity Indra may eat the meat of oxen (Beaf) and finish it soon which shall bring happiness to you and he likes it most and you please cook that meat now.
Indrani answered ; That’s why her husband Dev – Raj Indra is handsome, has the power, youthfulness and wisdom than all other deities.
Indra said : My wife Indrani cooks the meat of 15-20 oxen, He eats that, that’s why he has become fare, fresh and attractive. My abdomen is always full with meat and liquor (Sharaab).
Pandit Madhusudan ji (Bihari) has described Indra as meat eater9Beaf eater) and fond of liquor. Mahamndleshwar swami Maheshanand ji criticized these Mantras and Indra in his book, ‘ Chatur varney Bharat samiksha,’ and said that Indra looks like a deity of Tibetan demons. He doubts if he isIndra as deities could be purely vegetarians only. But this an example from Rigwed.
Now let us see one example from Smritis : It can be called the Hindu marriage act of ancient Hindu religion.Manu smriti, adhyay 3, Salok 13, ‘ swrnaagre….0’ and Salok 14,’Shudrew Bharya….0 ‘ the society is abided by these shlokas that the Brahman should prefer to marry a Brahmin girl first time but if his lust is not satisfied then he is allowed to marry the girls of Kshtrani, then Vaishnvi, then Shudrani. There is no harm in marrying the girls from these casts.Others are bound to marry in between the casts but Brahmin is exempted to satisfy his lust. Is this the social justificationin Hindu Smritis?
In Manu smriti adhyay 5 Shalok 155, “ Nasiti Istrina…” and Shaloka 157, ‘Kamntu….0” and Shalok 164, vyabhichahaat ….0, ‘ It is said that neither the heaven is for the women without their husbands, nor Hawans, nor Fasts. Only the service to her husband shall take her to heaven. If the husband passes away, the woman should sleep on floor,and eat roots of plants and weaken her body means to kill her desires whereas the men have left to enjoy the life and is allowed to marry another woman.
‘Wiprsesewaiv…0 ‘ and shloka 125, onchishnamanm….0 ‘ says that the first duty of suppressed class Shudra is to serve the Brahmins.In lieu of his services, the shudra be paid old utensils, torn cloths, half-eaten food etc for his livelihood. The women and Dalits (Shudras) are not allowed to perform any religious duty.
Maha-Bharat :
Mahabharat van parv, adhyay 207, Dron parv, adhyay 67 and Shantiparv, ahyay 29 reveals Raja Ranti Dev as cow meat eater and as great cow killer. Does it represent the socio-religious character of this nation?
Tantra :
The disciples of Shaiv and Shakt believe that Lord Shiva and his Shakti – the power, can never be satisfied without meat and liquor.There are manu such temples in India where the meat and liquor is offered and served.
Shiv Puran :
In Shiv Puran , Rudra sanhita-2, Satikhand-2, adhyay-19, has described Brahma as lusty and cheater, untrustworthy. The mythological story is;
At the wedding ceremony of Shiva, the Brahma got excited to see the beauty of Sati. Lord Shiva irritated and decided to kill Brahma. At last Vishnu prayed Lord Shiva to cool down and saved Brahma.
Another example of Lust and sex;
Shiv Puran koti Rudra sanhita-4, Adhyay-12, There is such a derogatory storey which my pen is not able to write but I try to give you a brief description.In Daru forest, Shiv ji was roaming nude…. Without any shame of Rishi (Hermits) women who aroused to see him nude. When Rishis came back and they saw-Shiva nude in front of the women, they got annoyed and cursed Shiva that his male organ (Penis) may break-away and sooner his penis fell on earth. Then a huge fire ignited out of it. The whole universe felt its heat. Then all the deities and Rishi (Hermits) prayed together to Brahma and with his consent, they all went to Shiva. Then they flattered and bowed before Parvati (Wife of Shiva), prayed to get them released from this problem. The Parvati then changed herself in a vaginal shape and inserted this fire-ball penis into her vagina .
Since then the worshipping of vagina and penis made of Stone in temples started. Hindu women and men offer water , pour on penis so that there private organs may always be cooled. Shiva and Parvati are thus pleased and give the desired results to the devotees.
Madhupurak sutra ;
In Parskar Grih Sutra, Kaanj ! Kandka 3, This is mentioned that Madhupurak is not completed without the killing of Cows
Adhyagm adhivivahukarat ityewm bruyaat (30). Means- so say like this that the to complete Yagya and wedding, make a kill.
YADI API ASAKRIT SMVASSHRSYA SOMEN YJET KRITARGHYA EV ENM YAJYEYU : NA AKRITKARGHYA ITI SRUTE : (31)
Means – the host which would like to perform Yagya many times a year, he should invite those Brahmins to perform who have gone through Madhupurak. This is the order of Vedas. Without Madhupurak Brahmins this should never be performed.
It is clearly visible that the creator of these shalokas is a con chandal, he could not be a Brahmin because he wants to see the Cow killed at wedding and Hawan – Yagya.
In the video pasted below the respected Sadhus of Hindus are shown eating human flesh from pyres.
"Do you know these Agohoris not only eat half burnt dead bodies from the cremation grounds while doing the mantra and tantra they do sex with dead woman, they drink and dance naked around the cremating burning dead bodies. During day time they cover their bodies with ash of cremation grounds. More of them they prefer the sacrifices of black goats, Jhota (Buffalo) and black Fowl. They are so ruthless they drink the raw blood from the severed heads of these animals. They also prefer to pet street dogs and share the meats with them when need be, they kill one of their pet dog and eat it. Now imagine they still have the normal status in society and they are the one at times they eat their own shit and drink their own urine.
The great Hindu society touch their feet and call them as messengers of God. I feel idiots like Ram Rahim had taken the Guru Mantars from these insanes.That is why the followers of his call themselves INSAN the shorter form of "INSANE."

I don’t mean to hurt the faith of any person but look the RSS is trying to make a connection with these Hindu deities with Sikh Gurus. There is absolutely no comparison. This is vast subject so I refer my another blog to know the truth whether Sikhs are Hindus or not.

Through this blog, i request the high cadre of RSS and other hindu fanatic organizations, If they really believe in brotherhood and considers Sikhs as their brothers, they should immediately stop this wargame. They should apologize immediately before it gets late.

Our Gurus sacrificed to save Hindu religion and our fore fathers stood as guard to protect Hindus and their religion, now we expect from you to accept our Sikh religion as a separate and sovereign religion, not as a branch of Hindu religion if they want peace forever in India.
And remind him anything more to add.

Written by;
Ajmer Singh Randhawa.


For more information on this subject that Sikhs are not Hindus, please visit;

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k7FS95m9OaI